Month: February 2024

Posted on

Week 9 -LA#1

Enhancing Community in Online Nursing Education

Creating a sense of community in online nursing education is essential yet challenging. Drawing from the readings below, three strategies resonate for me to foster connections and engagement among students and instructors.

Effective Strategies:

  1. Instructor Modeling: Instructors play a crucial role by actively participating in discussions, providing prompt feedback, and demonstrating professional values, setting a tone for empathy and collaboration.
  2. Interactive Dialogue: Structured discussions and group activities encourage peer support and collaborative learning, critical in nursing education for developing critical thinking and practical skills.
  3. Purposeful Course Design: Incorporating interactive elements like forums, virtual simulations, and live sessions in course design can significantly enhance engagement and provide varied learning opportunities.

Addressing Challenges:

  1. Presence and Engagement: Overcoming the absence of physical cues and varying digital literacy levels among students requires innovative use of multimedia and clear guidelines for participation.
  2. Practical Skills Development: Leveraging virtual simulations and arranging for in-person experiences, where feasible, can help bridge the gap in teaching practical nursing skills online.

Overcoming Obstacles:

Adopting a mix of synchronous and asynchronous methods, offering virtual office hours, and creating informal virtual spaces can mitigate feelings of isolation and strengthen the learning community.

Conclusion:

By integrating these strategies and acknowledging the challenges of online learning, nursing educators can build a supportive and effective educational environment that prepares students for the demands of the nursing profession.

Posted on

Week 7- LA #2

The Five Stage Model and the Community of Inquiry (COI) framework are influential concepts in online and blended learning, offering perspectives on how to foster effective learning environments. They share common goals in enhancing educational experiences but approach them through different lenses. Here’s a comparison highlighting their similarities and differences:

Five Stage Model

Gilly Salmon developed the Five Stage Model, a structured framework designed to facilitate online learning and e-moderation.  She explains it by using the metaphor of climbing a mountain with the support of the sherpa who is there to guide, support and assist. It outlines five progressive stages that learners move through in an online course:

  1. Access and Motivation: Ensuring participants can access the online environment and are motivated to engage. The learner sees the mountain.
  2. Online Socialization: Encouraging participants to connect and form a learning community. The learner begins to form groups to support the ascent.
  3. Information Exchange:  Involves sharing and disseminating information among participants. The learners share what they know about climbing the mountain and use the sherpa’s support to deepen their understanding.
  4. Knowledge Construction: Collaboratively building knowledge through dialogue and interaction. Through the interaction in their groups and the sherpa’s support and guidance, the learner has reached the summit.
  5. Development: Applying the knowledge gained in practical or reflective ways. Now that the learner is at the summit of the mountain they can use all they have learned getting to this place and start to apply it to other areas of learning, This allows the learner to integrate the learning.

Community of Inquiry (COI) Framework

The COI framework, developed by Garrison, Anderson, and Archer, focuses on creating a deep and meaningful learning experience through the development of three interrelated presences:

  1. Social Presence: The ability of participants to project their personal characteristics into the community, thereby presenting themselves as “real people.”
  2. Cognitive Presence: The extent to which learners are able to construct and confirm meaning through sustained reflection and discourse.
  3. Teaching Presence: The design, facilitation, and direction of cognitive and social processes to achieve personally meaningful and educationally worthwhile learning outcomes.

Similarities

  • Both models emphasize the importance of building a learning community where participants feel connected and supported.
  • Both suggest that learning occurs through a progression of stages or steps, whether it’s the development of community and cognitive abilities or the sequential stages of engagement in the learning process.
  • Both frameworks value interaction and collaboration among learners and between learners and instructors as essential for effective learning.

Differences

  • The Five Stage Model provides a more structural approach to the development of online learning, focusing on activities and strategies across different stages. The COI framework, on the other hand, centres on the qualitative aspects of the learning environment through social, cognitive, and teaching presences.
  • The COI framework distributes the responsibility for facilitating learning more broadly across social, cognitive, and teaching presences without specifying a particular role like an e-moderator.

 

The Five Stage Model is a practical guide for structuring online courses, and the COI framework provides a theoretical foundation for understanding the dynamics of online learning environments. Despite their differences, the Five Stage Model and the COI framework contribute valuable insights into designing and facilitating effective online learning experiences. They complement each other, with the Five Stage Model offering a practical roadmap for course development and the COI framework providing a deeper understanding of the essential elements that constitute a rich learning environment. Integrating the strengths of both models could lead to more engaging, effective, and meaningful online learning experiences.

 

Vaughan, N. D., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Garrison, R.D

Salmon, G. (2006). 80:20 for e-moderators. In: The challenge of ecompetence in academic staff development . CELT, NUI Galway, Galway, Republic of Ireland, pp. 145-154. Retrieved from https://eprints.usq.edu.au/18862/2/Salmon_Ch16_2006_PV.pdf

Salmon, G. (2006). Climbing the Learning Mountain [Video file]. Source: https://youtu.be/GbwJMKWFfbI

. (2013). Facilitation. In Teaching in blended learning environments: Creating and sustaining communities of inquiry (pp.45-62). Athabasca, AB: Athabasca University Press. Retrieved from http://www.aupress.ca/books/120229/ebook/03_Vaughan_et_al_2013-Teaching_in_Blended_Learning_Environments.pdf CC BY-NC-ND 2.5 CA

Posted on

Week 6- LA#3

Lesson Title: Introduction to Bilateral Stimulation for Stress Management

Lesson Duration: approximately 4 hours (not including lunch break)

Target Audience: Youth aged 16-18 with varying levels of familiarity with mental wellness concepts

Learning Environment: Online, using a combination of synchronous and asynchronous activities

Situational Factors to Consider:

  • Technological accessibility and digital literacy
  • Prior knowledge of mental wellness concepts
  • Emotional and psychological readiness

 

Learning Goals:

Cognitive Domain-understanding neurobiology: By the end of the lesson, students can identify the basic neurobiology of the brain structures, neural pathways, and neurotransmitters involved in the stress response.

 

This understanding will be assessed through a multiple-choice question knowledge check that demonstrates their knowledge of neurobiology and its connection to bilateral stimulation. The knowledge check can be taken multiple times until a passing score is obtained.  (I want to build it with the capacity to have the information they need along with the quiz so they can learn and reinforce the learning as they go and the quiz won’t go on until they have learned the information…like the quizzes we do in IHA for iLearns that you can take multiple times and go back and look at the information again until you have it….not sure what technology I would need for that)

 

Affective Domain-Personalized Wellness Plan: By the end of the lesson each student will create a personalized mental wellness plan that incorporates bilateral stimulation techniques,  demonstrating integration of knowledge and personal relevance.

 

 

Educative Feedback and Assessment:

  • Formative Assessment: Students will participate in a guided practical activity during the live session, receiving immediate verbal feedback from the instructor. They will also have an opportunity to seek guidance on their wellness plan 1:1 with instructor during one of the self-directed learning times.

 

  • Summative Assessment: Students will show proficiency of understanding of the basic biology of the brain by scoring 70% or higher on a multiple choice knowledge check.

 

Students will submit a wellness plan that applies the knowledge they have about brain structure and bilateral stimulation in the management of mental wellness.

 

Teaching/Learning Activities:

  1. Introduction (20 minutes): Students will be asked to remain on camera for the duration of the lesson except when other videos are playing or when there is quiet reflection time. Introductions and ice breaker game. Students will introduce themselves by their “backward name” (DEBRA=ARBED) then share with the group 3 things about themselves. A short brainstorm session to establish the rules of the classroom relating to emotional safety and respect will take place-and a classroom code of conduct will be produced.

Students will also be given resources for mental health support should the content be activating and more robust follow up required by a counsellor. Crisis line numbers will be available to all students.

**********************BREAK FOR 10 MINUTES********************************

  1. Introduction to the brain (20 minutes): Brief lecture on the mechanics of the brain, neurobiology and how stress impacts us. This information will segue into the connection between neurobiology and bilateral stimulation and how it can support mental wellness. Short video to reinforce the lecture material- this will be posted as a resource. To reinforce the information there will also be alternative resources available (infographic, podcast, article) This will support students with diverse learning styles.

********************************BREAK FOR 10 MINUTES**********************

  1. Self-directed learning time (30 minutes)- This is a time for students to go over the information given to them in the lecture on their own. An opportunity to look at the other resources. Instructions for this section of the lesson will include a challenge to find a relevant resource of their own to share with the class.
  2. Interactive Discussion (20 minutes): Live discussion facilitated by the instructor, encouraging students to share their initial thoughts on neurobiology, share the resources they have found, and discuss the connection to bilateral stimulation and neurobiology. Students will also be encouraged to share any prior experiences with stress management techniques.

*******************************BREAK FOR 10 MINUTES***********************

  1. Demonstration and Guided Practice (20 minutes):
    • The instructor demonstrates basic bilateral stimulation techniques via live video.
    • Students follow along in real time, practising the demonstrated techniques.
  2. Reflection and Self-directed time (45 minutes):
    • This time can be used to reinforce information. It is also time for students to reflect on their own stress and develop their wellness plan. Students will be placed in individual breakout rooms, and the instructor will spend the time visiting each student to support them with building their wellness plan.

****************************BREAK FOR Lunch 30 MINUTES*******************

  1. Knowledge check 1st try (20 minutes): Class will have an opportunity to try the knowledge check all at the same time- the knowledge check can be attempted until the minimum grade is achieved and will remain accessible after the first attempt to students after the lesson is over.
  2. Wrap-Up and Q&A (20 minutes):
    • Recap of key lesson points.
    • Open floor for questions, allowing students to seek clarification and further information on applying techniques in their lives.

Integration Check:

  • Ensure the learning activities are directly tied to the learning goals, with the formative and summative assessments designed to measure the outcomes of these activities effectively.
  • Provide resources for emotional support and additional learning for students who wish to explore deeper.

 

Materials Needed:

  • Access to the online platform for live sessions and submissions.
  • Handouts (digital) summarizing bilateral stimulation techniques.
  • Access to counselling or support services for students who may need emotional support.

By following this lesson plan, students are engaged through a combination of foundational knowledge building, active participation, reflective practice, and personal application, aligning with the integrated course design model for significant learning experiences.

 


top